Lindsay Clancy, William Sullivan
Digest more
Daily Mail on MSN
Lindsay Clancy judge has history presiding over killer mom cases
Judge William F Sullivan, 69, has presided over the murder trial of Lindsay Clancy.
Lindsay Clancy is facing trial in Massachusetts for allegedly killing her three children. Another woman, Latarsha Sanders, who was convicted of killing her two sons is now going to have a new trial. The two cases reportedly have some similarities, not the ...
Mediaite on MSN
Breaking news: Lindsay Clancy case headed to mistrial after Judge William Sullivan gives defense an hour to appeal
Judge Sullivan declared a mistrial in the Lindsay Clancy case, then caved to a defense attorney's request to appeal. The post BREAKING NEWS: Lindsay Clancy Case Headed to Mistrial After Judge William Sullivan Gives Defense an Hour to Appeal first appeared on Mediaite.
The Sunday Guardian Live on MSN
Who is William Sullivan? Judge presiding over the Lindsay Clancy trial - know his age, early career, education, net worth, family, background & more
India, Sept. 4 -- Lindsay Clancy Trial Latest News: As the Lindsay Clancy trial continues to draw widespread attention, the judge presiding over the high-profile case has also come into focus. William Sullivan has been in the Massachusetts courtroom for years,
Judge William Sullivan gave the jury what is sometimes called a dynamite charge, in the hope that they can still reach a verdict
Nebraska Public Examiner on MSN
Judge William Sullivan rebukes prosecution as Lindsay Clancy trial nears closing arguments
A dispute over prosecution rebuttal testimony drew a sharp response from Judge William Sullivan as Lindsay Clancy’s trial nears closing arguments.
CT Insider on MSN
Lindsay Clancy mistrial recap: Patrick Clancy says a new trial will be 'extraordinarily painful'
Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial Friday after a justice denied the defense's request for an emergency stay.
Judge William Sullivan is giving Lindsay Clancy’s attorney more time to petition the Supreme Judicial Court for a stay after the judge said he would declare a mistrial. The 12 jurors in the case wrote a third note saying that they could not come to a consensus on a verdict.