This is Part 2 of a series on moral relativism. The previous article can be found here. Lack of virtue. Moral relativism is based on individual preferences. Exactly who would do the nominating who for ...

In certain political and religious circles, the notion of moral relativism — that there is no objective “right” or wrong, only individual opinions — is not just anathema, not merely abhorrent. It is ...

Some articles I’ve read using the term moral relativism prompt me to clarify: Moral relativism does not mean you don’t believe in anything. It means you don’t believe there is an objective or ...

"Isn't all morality relative?" I often get this question from students, as there seems to be a fairly pervasive acceptance of moral relativism in much of our culture these days. However, the answer to ...

Broadly speaking, ethical relativism contends that ethical rules are drawn from human experience and that what is right or wrong is dependent upon particular times and places. There are cultural ...

Who Is Going to Be Next to Donate $1,776 to Our July 4 Fundraiser? The Roe v. Wade of Birthright Citizenship Trad Schism, Again New York Times Story Features ‘Tree Rights’ Audio By Carbonatix As the ...

Elvis. Tupac. The ivory-billed woodpecker. Sometimes it’s hard to let go and acknowledge when a celebrity or a species has left us. Christians find it particularly hard to come to terms with the ...

Newton’s third law almost fits our polarized politics: For every action there is an extreme and opposite reaction. As Gerard Baker notes in “Trump Accelerates Our Decline Into Moral Relativism” (Free ...

The Reverend Canon Professor Scott Cowdell is Research Professor in Public and Contextual Theology at Charles Sturt University, Canberra, and Canon Theologian of the Canberra-Goulburn Anglican Diocese ...

The moral relativist contradicts himself when he insists that relativism creates freedom. This is impossible, as freedom cannot create values―rather, freedom presupposes values. As Pope St. John Paul ...