The peer review process is central to science – but it can be easily manipulated. Improving it is vital to uphold research integrity.

Are you just checking the boxes by doing required training hours, or is your goal to get a return on your investment? […] ...

As many Western countries reverse their former embrace of so-called “gender-affirming care” as it applies to children, the American medical establishment has obstinately pretended that puberty ...

A&A Focus webcast featured a deep dive into step 4 of the five-step revenue recognition process outlined in FASB ASC Topic 606, as well as news on new auditing standards exposure drafts.

AI offers significant benefits to science. Researchers have used specialised AI models to solve scientific problems for many ...

Jonathan Majors plays an amateur bodybuilder in the dark drama “Magazine Dreams.” The film is the first major release since ...

For years, public-health authorities downplayed the risk that pathogens could spread via droplets light enough to circulate ...

Want to go on a nature hike but can’t get out to the woods? Look for the plants and animals right around the corner.

In CQV Co. Ltd. v. Merck Patent GmbH, the Federal Circuit addressed (1) the interaction of indemnification agreements with ...

Republicans have rightfully criticized Democrats in recent years for leaning on the Supreme Court in an effort to intimidate the justices into supporting a progressive agenda. It’s unfortunate that so ...

Institutional peer review led to recommended changes in more than one-quarter of radiotherapy treatment plans, according to results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.Recommendations for changes ...

The president’s legal position that he can proceed with no input from Congress or judicial review is on shaky ground. Trump understands politics well enough to know that his endorsement is an ...