The peer review process is central to science – but it can be easily manipulated. Improving it is vital to uphold research integrity.

Are you just checking the boxes by doing required training hours, or is your goal to get a return on your investment? […] ...

Despite the buzz surrounding smart cities in urban-policy circles, studies are lacking on the evidence for what works, what ...

In a stark sign of scientists’ escalating frustration with how academic journals operate, researchers are taking on six ...

I enjoy Christer Watson’s regular Journal Gazette column in which he insightfully explains scientific and technological ...

Different academic and industry norms within AI ethics underscore the potential benefit of shared preprinting guidelines and ...

As many Western countries reverse their former embrace of so-called “gender-affirming care” as it applies to children, the American medical establishment has obstinately pretended that puberty ...

The late leftist journalist Andrew Kopkind pointed to “the universal desire of statesmen to make their most monstrous ...

South Carolina on Friday is scheduled to put the first person to death by firing squad in the U.S. in 15 years. Brad Sigmon, ...

A&A Focus webcast featured a deep dive into step 4 of the five-step revenue recognition process outlined in FASB ASC Topic 606, as well as news on new auditing standards exposure drafts.

Harris Beach Murtha attorneys Abbie Fuchs, Dan Strecker, and Alessandra Ash review and analyze key judicial holdings and legal developments in ...

Both climate change and human activities significantly impact the oceans by causing global warming, sea level rise, acidification, pollution, altered ...