Opinion: Companies that want to deploy artificial intelligence for legal purposes must understand the risks that poses and ...

A condo board member was denied access to legal records. An attorney explains if attorney-client privilege applies.

Bangkok, Thailand - March 05, 2026 - PRESSADVANTAGE - Siam Legal International, a leading law firm in Thailand and ...

ALBANY, N.Y. (NEWS10) — A new federal ruling is raising questions about how artificial intelligence could impact the legal ...

Attorneys at Reed Smith LLP discuss the rise in securities litigation and D&O claims leading to the need for policyholders to ...

If you’ve asked ChatGPT, Gemini, or Claude legal questions, you may have created a trail you didn’t expect.

Recent court cases show asking an AI chatbot questions about your legal case could allow opposing parties to see your confidential trial strategy.

AI chats are not authomatically protected. In U.S. v. Heppner, Claude conversations seized by the FBI were not attorney-client privileged or work product.

A US federal court ruling that AI chat logs are not protected by attorney-client privilege is drawing attention from insurers and financial institutions reviewing how employees use consumer AI tools ...

The recent conviction and imprisonment of Chidozie Nwangwu, a traditional spiritual practitioner in Anambra State — under the ...

In a first of its kind ruling, a Judge in the U.S. District for the Southern District of New York held that documents that a ...

Heppner holds that consumer AI use can destroy privilege; Warner holds that AI-assisted drafting is protected work product. Both were decided in the same week. Both may be correct on their own facts.