We have passed laws prohibiting discrimination in education, in employment, in housing; but these laws alone cannot overcome the heritage of . . . poverty and degradation and pain. Proxy ...

Part I of this Essay canvasses the various definitions of AI bias, showing that although these different conceptions may illuminate important nuances, they also make understanding and addressing AI ...

But attorney-client privilege doctrine already protects many confidential exchanges with non-attorneys so long as they are necessary to facilitate legal services from the client’s lawyer. Moreover, ...

This Essay argues that automated student monitoring implicates Section 504 in two ways. The first relates to a school’s response after surveillance software flags a student’s expression. 14Open this ...

In his essay, Cheng-chi (Kirin) Chang examines Mobley v. Workday, the most consequential AI-discrimination case currently in litigation, through the l ...

The resolutions and aims which by tradition have a place in the first issue of a law review are hard for us in modesty and humility to state. Yet, a few words may focus our intentions both for our ...

In the summer of 2022, the Supreme Court decided New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, holding that the Second Amendment protects a general right to carry firearms in public for ...

The rest of this Essay proceeds in three parts. Part I briefly recounts the use of the “set aside” language in federal statutes providing for judicial review—from the term’s debut appearance in the ...

A Note for Readers: Adversarial collaborations are written by scholars who hold opposing views on their topic—together, they write one Essay to clarify points of agreement, precisely identify areas of ...

A Note for Readers: Adversarial collaborations are written by scholars who hold opposing views on their topic—together, they write one Essay to clarify points of agreement, precisely identify areas of ...

This episode and others are suggestive of the increasing strain on prosecutors charged with implementing Administration directives that may improperly target opponents or reward supporters. While ...

EO 14230 is not merely bureaucratic overreach; it is, as Judge Howell suggested during the initial hearing, a directive that “puts the cart before the horse” and mirrors “what happened during the Red ...