Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 (1968), is a 1968 United States Supreme Court ruling in which the Court held that a defendant was deprived of his rights under the Confrontation …

Bruton applies in a more limited context: whenever the State in a joint trial seeks to admit a testimonial hearsay confession of a non-testifying codefendant that directly incriminates the …

Therefore, if you find that a confession was, in fact, voluntarily and intentionally made by the defendant Evans, you should consider it as evidence in the case against Evans, but you must …

Jul 20, 2025 · The Supreme Court’s holding created the “Bruton Rule.” This rule states that in a joint criminal trial, the prosecution cannot introduce a confession from a non-testifying …

George William Bruton and William James Evans were tried together for robbing a jewelry store that also operated as a U.S. Postal Service contract station. At trial, the judge admitted in to …

Jan 30, 2025 · Visit the small Somerset village for heavenly food, contemporary art and verdant countryside. Tucked into the Somerset hills but easily accessible from London, Bristol and …

Get Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 (1968), United States Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Written and curated by real attorneys at …

Aug 19, 2025 · Yes, there are the celebrities who have flocked to Bruton, but they’re happily in disguise: more workwear than gleaming Barbour International, antique Boujaad rugs over …

What are Bruton issues? Bruton issues refer to situations in federal trials where a defendant’s right to confront witnesses is compromised by the admission of a co-defendant’s confession …

At trial, the court allowed testimony of a witness, who indicated that co-defendant confessed to the crime and to having the help of Petitioner in committing the crime, to be admitted against co …